This free survey is powered by QUESTIONPRO.COM
  1. Surveys
  2. 2005
  3. April
  4. R
  5. R2.0 Size/Weight Survey
 

Hello:


You are invited to participate in a survey that will help us define our future roadmap priorities for our MCLB R2.0 Broadband network. It will take approximately 15 minutes to complete the questionnaire.



It is very important for us to learn your opinions before we make critical decisions on the future of MCLB.



If you have questions about the survey, you may contact Brian Bullock at (847) 576-1433 or by email at the email address specified below.



The password for the survey is: mclb.



Thank you very much for your time and support. Please start with the survey now by clicking on the Continue button below.
 
 
 
* Please enter your name
   
 
 

Select the response which best describes your role.
   
 
 

Rank the following criteria in order of importance from 1-6 for the R2.0 network. 1being most important and 6 being least important.
Market availability in 2006
Lighter devices than competition
Cost
Market availability in 2007
Aesthetics of devices
Ease of serviceability/deployment
 
 
How important are the following product characteristics to your customers in the selection of new hardware products?
Not Important Somewhat Unimportant Neutral Somewhat Important Extremely Important
Ease of Installation
Device supports both 4.9 and 2.4 GHz
Aesthetics of device
Ease of serviceability
Smaller/lighter than competition
Battery backup available
Value Relative to Cost
Overall Reliability
Overall Performance
Market availability in 2006
 
 
In conversations with my customers this issue is brought up frequently.
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Ease of installation
Aesthetics of device
Weight of device
Battery backup required
Value relative to cost
 
 

Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
A smaller/lighter device is important to my customers
A smaller/lighter device would provide a significant competitive advantage
Customers would pay a premium for a smaller/lighter solution
Delaying market delivery is acceptable to obtain a smaller/lighter solution
 
 
 

Assume R2.0 combined 4.9/2.4GHz access point is 30lbs without mounting hardware or antennas. To make a smaller/lighter device solution delivery could be:
1Q07 2Q07 3Q07 Time to market is more important than optimizing sixe/weight.
 
 

If size/weight is optimized the latest acceptible delivery would be:
1Q07 2Q07 3Q07 Must be deliverd 4Q06 regardless of size/weight
 
 

Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Reliability is important to my customers
My customers would accept active fans as a cooling mechanism to obtain a lighter weight device
My customers would accept a plastic housing to obtain a lighter weight device
 
Step 1 of 2
Price Higher price for lower weight not acceptable Higher price for lower weight not acceptable
WeightWeight lower than competitionWeight lower than competition
Time to market2H 20062H 2006
Battery backupOption available only for large deploymentsOption for all customers
Strongly Prefer LeftSomewhat PreferIndifferentSomewhat PreferStrongly Prefer Right
 
Please contact [email protected] if you have any questions regarding this survey.
Survey Software Powered by QuestionPro Survey Software