1. Surveys
  2. 2005
  3. January
  4. S
  5. Student Course Evaluation (Teacher Evaluation) - C
0%
 
 
To the students of this class: Thank you for taking the time and effort to respond to this questionnaire. Please give your most candid and thorough response to the questions below. Rest assured that the information you share here is confidential.



The survey is divided into three sections: -


  1. About the student

  2. Evaluation of the course

  3. Evaluation of the instructor




Please try to complete and send the course evaluation by [DEADLINE].
 
 
 
I. Yourself as a Student
 
 
Please rate yourself based on your academic performance
 
Excellent
 
Good
 
Fair
 
Average or Poor
 
 
 
Class Year
 
III yr Medical Course
 
V yr Medical Course
 
 

If you are a V year student then please say how much of Pharmacology knowledge you carry to this year from your third year?
 
All of the Pharmacology knowledge
 
Just a little
 
None
 
 
 
Rate the amount of work you did
 
Almost none
 
What was assigned
 
More than just what was assigned
 
 
 
Rate the level of your involvement in the activities of this course.
 
Very uninvolved
 
Somewhat involved
 
Enthusiastically involved
 
 
 
How much practical knowledge have you gained from this course?
 
A great deal
 
Some practical knowledge
 
None
 
 
 
II. General Evaluation of the Course
 

Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
The course objectives where clear
The course procedures and assignments support course objectives
The amount of reading you were asked to do was appropriate
The amount of writing or other class work you were asked to do was enough
 
 
 
What overall rating would you give the course in terms of its interest?
 
Excellent
 
Good
 
Average
 
Poor
 
Very Poor
 
 

What overall rating would you give the course in terms of its usefulness and Clinical relevance
 
Very much useful and clinically relevant
 
Just useful and has minimal clinical relevance
 
May or may not be useful, has no clinical relevance
 
Not useful at all
 
 

Based on the usefulness and clinical relevance do you feel you had enough time to learn and to be taught this subject?
 
Time was clearly very short
 
May be better if more time was alloted
 
Just the right amount of time
 
It had more time alloted than required
 
 

If you had said that the course had short of time then try and say how longer the course should be for you to better understand it
 
Two more semesters
 
One more semester
 
Just few more classes
 
Better to have it in more than one continous session, e.g. some classes in third year, few in fourth year and few in fifth year.
 
 
 
What are the major strengths of this course?
   
 
 
 
What are the major weaknesses of this course?
   
 
 

what was the most interesting session in Pharmacology?
 
Fundamentals
 
Cardiovascular Pharmacology
 
Neuropharmacology (Central Nervous System)
 
Miscellaneous (GIT, RS, Pain and NSAIDs)
 
Chemotherapy
 
 

What was the most difficult session in Pharmacology to follow and understand?
 
Fundamentals
 
Cardiovascular Pharmaoclogy
 
Neuropharmacology (Central Nervous System)
 
Miscellaneous
 
Chemotherapy
 
 

What was the textbook which you found easy to follow?
 
Pharmacology (by Rang, Dale, Ritter and Moore)
 
Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (by Katzung)
 
Lippincott's Illustrated Review in Pharmacology
 
Other, Please mention
 
 
 
III. General Evaluation of the Instructor
 
 
Never Sometimes Usually Most of the time Always
Could you get clear answers to your questions from the instructor?
Was the instructor considerate to you?
Was the instructor effective in teaching in the course?
Was the instructor enthusiastic about the course?
 
 
 
What overall rating would you give the instructor?
 
Excellent
 
Good
 
Average
 
Poor
 
Very poor
 
 
 
What would you recommend to improve the instructor's performance?
   
 
Please contact [email protected] or click here if you have any questions regarding this survey.